<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global warming and evolution</title>
	<link>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/</link>
	<description>Get the inside information on home schooling your child.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Gaver</title>
		<link>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Gaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>The mystery of ancestral descent

 


 

This is tale which tells what recessive genes hold, what inbreeding cause's and what degenerate animals look like.


A male lion breeds with a female tiger, makes a liger of great size!
2






a male leopard breed with a female lion brings forth a leopon. Which not only has the size and strength of the lion but also has the climbing abilities of the leopard.
3



 


All that has so far been said, is recognized by science.
4


Now into the realm of what has not yet been 'validated' (by science).
5


 


All the other cats are said to interbreed
from time to time.
6




 


The division of Species is based on the idea that, only members of the same 'Species' can indeed breed.
But if all cats ( including the Egyptian house cat) can breed, they are not different Species but only subspecies of the original cat.

Now, if the liger is bigger and the leopon is of the same size and better. Then it comes to reason that the original cat from off the Ark was a super cat.
Scientists say that the "extra" abilities that come out of these 'hybrids' are caused by "recessive genes"
Recessive Genes are created by inbreeding.



 


Now here is the part that might interest a historian. 



 


Gen 7:2

 

"Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female."


 

In this I think that the clean animals were allowed to descend without inbreeding and therefore pure. While the others were forced into inbreeding, which caused their abilities to go into 'Recessive genes'. The ancients had enough trouble with the lions, tigers, etc. So this might have been set to preserve man. Did you know that in India they breed the wild dog with the wolf to get a bigger breed. This alone means nothing, except that there is a story whcih appeared shortly after the flood. No later that 500 years, or 600, or 700, etc, after the flood. The story told of a great king who had wolves so great that his men were able to ride upon them, for they were far greater than any horse.



 

Maybe I'm going nowhere, but if only two cats, two dogs, two bears, etc, walked off the Ark. Then I say that it would immediately force inbreeding, which in turn would force abilities to go into recessive genes. And (to the point) would force the super Cat to degenerate into the lion, tiger, leopard, cheetah and house cat that we have today. 



 

I'm sorry I couldn't help joking and calling the lion and tiger a degenerate.



 



 

"In the production of pure breeds of sheep, cattle, hogs, and horses inbreeding has frequently been practiced extensively, and where in such cases selection has been made of the more vigorous offspring as parents, it is doubtful whether any diminution in size, vigor, or fertility has resulted. Nevertheless it very frequently happens that when two pure breeds are crossed, the offspring surpass either pure race in size and vigor."


 


Sudden Origins by Jeffrey H. Schwartz





 

The tiger is either a pure breed are a degenerate species!
Or I say.
They are one and the same..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





 

Else, the reason why the clean were in sevens as opposed to the others.




 

Genetic research (and this basic reasoning and breeding) has shown that every type of wolf, dog, fox and coyote etc. came from the 1 original wolf.
Scott, John Paul and John L. Fuller Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog
Behaviour of Wolves, Dogs and Related Canines (Hardcover) by Michael W. Fox





 


Mitochondrial Eve (mt-mrca)

"Mitochondrial Eve is the ...........common ancestor (MRCA) of all human via the mitochondrial DNA pathway . In other words, she is the MRCA found when ancestry of all living humans is traced back in time, following only the maternal lineage. Mitochondrial DNA pathway is equivalent to maternal lineage, because Mitochondrial DNA is only passed down from mother to child, never father to child. [1]"

 

 

Camel-Llama-alpaca




 

All known subspecies of the "horse" are known to breed!

 
1 Last thing.
this theory is observable  &#38; testable, in that you can breed new 'breeds' of dogs in just a few years. But each of these will have less 'ablities' than the last.
 
Just take 2 dogs (of your choice) &#38; place them in a zoo. Now there children will be fine but as there children breed with each other you will see the same thing happen. Only it will go ten times further than before.
 
Kentish Son
 
I am sending this into the world because I want to get the word out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mystery of ancestral descent</p>
<p>This is tale which tells what recessive genes hold, what inbreeding cause&#8217;s and what degenerate animals look like.</p>
<p>A male lion breeds with a female tiger, makes a liger of great size!<br />
2</p>
<p>a male leopard breed with a female lion brings forth a leopon. Which not only has the size and strength of the lion but also has the climbing abilities of the leopard.<br />
3</p>
<p>All that has so far been said, is recognized by science.<br />
4</p>
<p>Now into the realm of what has not yet been &#8216;validated&#8217; (by science).<br />
5</p>
<p>All the other cats are said to interbreed<br />
from time to time.<br />
6</p>
<p>The division of Species is based on the idea that, only members of the same &#8216;Species&#8217; can indeed breed.<br />
But if all cats ( including the Egyptian house cat) can breed, they are not different Species but only subspecies of the original cat.</p>
<p>Now, if the liger is bigger and the leopon is of the same size and better. Then it comes to reason that the original cat from off the Ark was a super cat.<br />
Scientists say that the &#8220;extra&#8221; abilities that come out of these &#8216;hybrids&#8217; are caused by &#8220;recessive genes&#8221;<br />
Recessive Genes are created by inbreeding.</p>
<p>Now here is the part that might interest a historian. </p>
<p>Gen 7:2</p>
<p>&#8220;Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.&#8221;</p>
<p>In this I think that the clean animals were allowed to descend without inbreeding and therefore pure. While the others were forced into inbreeding, which caused their abilities to go into &#8216;Recessive genes&#8217;. The ancients had enough trouble with the lions, tigers, etc. So this might have been set to preserve man. Did you know that in India they breed the wild dog with the wolf to get a bigger breed. This alone means nothing, except that there is a story whcih appeared shortly after the flood. No later that 500 years, or 600, or 700, etc, after the flood. The story told of a great king who had wolves so great that his men were able to ride upon them, for they were far greater than any horse.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m going nowhere, but if only two cats, two dogs, two bears, etc, walked off the Ark. Then I say that it would immediately force inbreeding, which in turn would force abilities to go into recessive genes. And (to the point) would force the super Cat to degenerate into the lion, tiger, leopard, cheetah and house cat that we have today. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I couldn&#8217;t help joking and calling the lion and tiger a degenerate.</p>
<p>&#8220;In the production of pure breeds of sheep, cattle, hogs, and horses inbreeding has frequently been practiced extensively, and where in such cases selection has been made of the more vigorous offspring as parents, it is doubtful whether any diminution in size, vigor, or fertility has resulted. Nevertheless it very frequently happens that when two pure breeds are crossed, the offspring surpass either pure race in size and vigor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sudden Origins by Jeffrey H. Schwartz</p>
<p>The tiger is either a pure breed are a degenerate species!<br />
Or I say.<br />
They are one and the same..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Else, the reason why the clean were in sevens as opposed to the others.</p>
<p>Genetic research (and this basic reasoning and breeding) has shown that every type of wolf, dog, fox and coyote etc. came from the 1 original wolf.<br />
Scott, John Paul and John L. Fuller Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog<br />
Behaviour of Wolves, Dogs and Related Canines (Hardcover) by Michael W. Fox</p>
<p>Mitochondrial Eve (mt-mrca)</p>
<p>&#8220;Mitochondrial Eve is the &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..common ancestor (MRCA) of all human via the mitochondrial DNA pathway . In other words, she is the MRCA found when ancestry of all living humans is traced back in time, following only the maternal lineage. Mitochondrial DNA pathway is equivalent to maternal lineage, because Mitochondrial DNA is only passed down from mother to child, never father to child. [1]&#8221;</p>
<p>Camel-Llama-alpaca</p>
<p>All known subspecies of the &#8220;horse&#8221; are known to breed!</p>
<p>1 Last thing.<br />
this theory is observable  &amp; testable, in that you can breed new &#8216;breeds&#8217; of dogs in just a few years. But each of these will have less &#8216;ablities&#8217; than the last.</p>
<p>Just take 2 dogs (of your choice) &amp; place them in a zoo. Now there children will be fine but as there children breed with each other you will see the same thing happen. Only it will go ten times further than before.</p>
<p>Kentish Son</p>
<p>I am sending this into the world because I want to get the word out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online gambling casino portal</title>
		<link>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>online gambling casino portal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/#comment-848</guid>
		<description>online style casino gambling &lt;a href="http://freeiq.com/taylor70?fullbio=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;gambling game casino online&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>online style casino gambling <a href="http://freeiq.com/taylor70?fullbio=1" rel="nofollow">gambling game casino online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Known Ways to Unknowingly Annoy Other Homeschool Blogs &#124; Homeschool Insider Blog</title>
		<link>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Known Ways to Unknowingly Annoy Other Homeschool Blogs &#124; Homeschool Insider Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] happy that we had made a post dealing with the subject of evolution. (You can read that post here.) Our post was not favorable to the evolutionary viewpoint as we are convinced that it is false [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] happy that we had made a post dealing with the subject of evolution. (You can read that post here.) Our post was not favorable to the evolutionary viewpoint as we are convinced that it is false [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global warming and evolution</title>
		<link>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Global warming and evolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://homeschoolinsider.com/blog/global-warming-and-evolution/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] Stony Creek Church - Weekly Sermon wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt I’ve noticed an interesting parallel between the global warming climate change predictions you’ve been hearing about, and the theory of evolution. Both claim to be based on “science”, yet neither one is observable, repeatable, nor testable. They are both presented as fact in spite of this. And even though evolution is still the theory of evolution last time I checked, when you see it presented in the media, the word theory is seldom used. If you dare question either of these ideas, you’re sho [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Stony Creek Church - Weekly Sermon wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt I’ve noticed an interesting parallel between the global warming climate change predictions you’ve been hearing about, and the theory of evolution. Both claim to be based on “science”, yet neither one is observable, repeatable, nor testable. They are both presented as fact in spite of this. And even though evolution is still the theory of evolution last time I checked, when you see it presented in the media, the word theory is seldom used. If you dare question either of these ideas, you’re sho [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
